Page 2 of 2
Re: ARCH MANNING
Posted: August 15th, 2025, 6:11 am
by DelMar
Bottom post of the previous page:
Truth wrote: ↑August 10th, 2025, 7:30 pm
I don’t think two mid round 1sts will be enough to move up into the top 5. If the Rams want Arch I think they will need to give up at 3 future 1sts.
So 2 first this year and the 3 future first?
Re: ARCH MANNING
Posted: August 15th, 2025, 10:00 am
by Bulldawg
DelMar wrote: ↑August 15th, 2025, 6:11 am
Truth wrote: ↑August 10th, 2025, 7:30 pm
I don’t think two mid round 1sts will be enough to move up into the top 5. If the Rams want Arch I think they will need to give up at 3 future 1sts.
So 2 first this year and the 3 future first?
Way too early to be talking about Manning and next year's draft...
BUT, if we want to trade up to a top 5 pick it will depend on 1)where we finish, and 2) where Falcons finish.
It will take more than a future first round to trade up with a #15 (Atlanta) and #25 (Rams) pick. Both picks could be higher or lower. Top 5 picks tend to be very expensive. Not to mention a future round 1 pick equates to a current round 2 pick. Best thing to happen is for Falcons to go 0-17 but that is not going to happen.
I would not be against getting the 3rd-4th QB out of the draft. (I think that is reasonable expectation with a trade.) Supposed to be a good draft year for QBs. History shows us there is still <50% chance the pick will be successful.
Re: ARCH MANNING
Posted: August 15th, 2025, 10:03 am
by DelMar
Bulldawg wrote: ↑August 15th, 2025, 10:00 am
DelMar wrote: ↑August 15th, 2025, 6:11 am
So 2 first this year and the 3 future first?
Way too early to be talking about Manning and next year's draft...
BUT, if we want to trade up to a top 5 pick it will depend on 1)where we finish, and 2) where Falcons finish.
It will take more than a future first round to trade up with a #15 (Atlanta) and #25 (Rams) pick. Both picks could be higher or lower. Top 5 picks tend to be very expensive. Not to mention a future round 1 pick equates to a current round 2 pick. Best thing to happen is for Falcons to go 0-17 but that is not going to happen.
I would not be against getting the 3rd-4th QB out of the draft. (I think that is reasonable expectation with a trade.) Supposed to be a good draft year for QBs. History shows us there is still <50% chance the pick will be successful.
Well if Stafford is out, I wouldn’t be shocked if the Falcons finished better than us. Sorry, but someone has to say this. Sucks.
I would NOT give up what Truth suggested. That’s way too much imo. 5 first rounders is way too much to offer
Re: ARCH MANNING
Posted: August 15th, 2025, 10:24 am
by Bulldawg
DelMar wrote: ↑August 15th, 2025, 10:03 am
Bulldawg wrote: ↑August 15th, 2025, 10:00 am
Way too early to be talking about Manning and next year's draft...
BUT, if we want to trade up to a top 5 pick it will depend on 1)where we finish, and 2) where Falcons finish.
It will take more than a future first round to trade up with a #15 (Atlanta) and #25 (Rams) pick. Both picks could be higher or lower. Top 5 picks tend to be very expensive. Not to mention a future round 1 pick equates to a current round 2 pick. Best thing to happen is for Falcons to go 0-17 but that is not going to happen.
I would not be against getting the 3rd-4th QB out of the draft. (I think that is reasonable expectation with a trade.) Supposed to be a good draft year for QBs. History shows us there is still <50% chance the pick will be successful.
Well if Stafford is out, I wouldn’t be shocked if the Falcons finished better than us. Sorry, but someone has to say this. Sucks.
I would NOT give up what Truth suggested. That’s way too much imo. 5 first rounders is way too much to offer
That is another option. Basically, we need the average of our 2 picks to be low for a higher chance. Might not need to trade if we have a really low pick. My preference would be a #1 pick and a #36 pick.
Stafford is playing and winning us another SB. (I need to place a bet with Vegas before the odds go back down.)
Re: ARCH MANNING
Posted: August 17th, 2025, 12:03 am
by NN1Badboy
DelMar wrote: ↑August 15th, 2025, 6:11 am
Truth wrote: ↑August 10th, 2025, 7:30 pm
I don’t think two mid round 1sts will be enough to move up into the top 5. If the Rams want Arch I think they will need to give up at 3 future 1sts.
So 2 first this year and the 3 future first?
I was thinking more like three, total. If Atlanta's pick is high enough in 26 we trade it for two future firsts. One in 27 and one in 28. Then in 27 we trade our first and those two along with our own pick to move up.
Re: ARCH MANNING
Posted: August 17th, 2025, 2:32 am
by STL Woody
DelMar wrote: ↑August 15th, 2025, 6:11 am
Truth wrote: ↑August 10th, 2025, 7:30 pm
I don’t think two mid round 1sts will be enough to move up into the top 5. If the Rams want Arch I think they will need to give up at 3 future 1sts.
So 2 first this year and the 3 future first?
I agree I’ve thought that it would take the 2026 1st round picks (2) and the 2027 to grab him or whomever the over all best QB is. I am fine with that.
Re: ARCH MANNING
Posted: August 17th, 2025, 5:29 am
by Bulldawg
Slow down on all the Archie talk. What has he done except being born with a great name? He couldn't even beat Ewers out at Texas. Yes, he has potential but he is not worth 1 first round pick yet. Now, if we are talking about ANY QB in next year's draft, I could get on board with speculating.
Re: ARCH MANNING
Posted: August 17th, 2025, 7:43 am
by ocram23
Bulldawg wrote: ↑August 17th, 2025, 5:29 am
Slow down on all the Archie talk. What has he done except being born with a great name? He couldn't even beat Ewers out at Texas. Yes, he has potential but he is not worth 1 first round pick yet. Now, if we are talking about ANY QB in next year's draft, I could get on board with speculating.
there will be a QB that comes out of the pack not named Manning