The Original Los Angeles Fans Discussion Forum
https://www.theramsforum.com/
I’ll say it again this^
If I'm the Rams, I'm pretty concerned about the LT spot. These guys never seem to stay healthy for 17 games. We need depth there. This will have to be addressed IMO unless I am missing something. It's mot McClendon at LT. Or Arcuri.
Agree. More depth is needed and McVay indicated such a few months ago. But depth can be addressed in later rounds. Im not doing it at 26. And im not drafting a OT at 26 unless they feel he is the heir apparent for Havs.
therealheadslap75 wrote: ↑April 21st, 2025, 2:45 pm ah the mythical BPA myth, its Need+BPA/2, If we have an OLB as the top guy on our board when we pick are we picking him? What about QB? I doubt it. Its always a needs based draft, if someone is a significant value when we pick, in a position that's important to stockpile, Ie OL and DL maybe we take them, I'm thinking we pick a CB or a WR, but I'm hoping we take Jihad
of course each team has their own BPA board and yes I don't think many teams give 2 shits what Mel Kiper thinksRamsfan08ny wrote: ↑April 21st, 2025, 3:20 pmtherealheadslap75 wrote: ↑April 21st, 2025, 2:45 pm ah the mythical BPA myth, its Need+BPA/2, If we have an OLB as the top guy on our board when we pick are we picking him? What about QB? I doubt it. Its always a needs based draft, if someone is a significant value when we pick, in a position that's important to stockpile, Ie OL and DL maybe we take them, I'm thinking we pick a CB or a WR, but I'm hoping we take Jihad
BPA is a myth anyways. We don't know their board, they may take the BPA on 'their' board, but we may have a different BPA, or Mel Kiper may have a different BPA.
But I do agree with what you're saying. I'm sure that they have guys tied on their list, and then it may come down to BPA+ need formula to see who they lean to.
Trick question? Do they take LB or QB @ #26 if they are the highest on their board? Uh... yes. Their best evaluated player meets areas of need would be welcomed for sure. LB now, QB very soon down the road as well.therealheadslap75 wrote: ↑April 21st, 2025, 2:45 pm ah the mythical BPA myth, its Need+BPA/2, If we have an OLB as the top guy on our board when we pick are we picking him? What about QB? I doubt it. Its always a needs based draft, if someone is a significant value when we pick, in a position that's important to stockpile, Ie OL and DL maybe we take them, I'm thinking we pick a CB or a WR, but I'm hoping we take Jihad
decision will be on McSnead obviously if it comes to thatRamPower wrote: ↑April 21st, 2025, 4:56 pmTrick question? Do they take LB or QB @ #26 if they are the highest on their board? Uh... yes. Their best evaluated player meets areas of need would be welcomed for sure. LB now, QB very soon down the road as well.therealheadslap75 wrote: ↑April 21st, 2025, 2:45 pm ah the mythical BPA myth, its Need+BPA/2, If we have an OLB as the top guy on our board when we pick are we picking him? What about QB? I doubt it. Its always a needs based draft, if someone is a significant value when we pick, in a position that's important to stockpile, Ie OL and DL maybe we take them, I'm thinking we pick a CB or a WR, but I'm hoping we take Jihad
Impact player is an impact player regardless of the position of course (w/ QB in its own category obviously). I mean there's quite a few D-lineman I'd be very happy with @ #26 even though it's currently a team strength.
If players are 1A and 1B, and one is an extreme area of need, (the other not what's-so-ever), then area of need all the way. But basically, I would be swinging for the next impact starter with our 1st round pick. If nothing comes close, and the next 10 picks look basically the same, sure trade down or whatever.
I love the draft as I look for someone to fall. This year I doubt it happens (the players in the top 15-20 seem pretty solid to stay there), but you never know. Here's hoping this year's Rams scouting knows what they are doing for an amazing third year in a row...
It's a big need, but I would not reach at 26. If top 3 are gone, just trade back and use BPA. Could be another Limmer late round pick type.Claremontram wrote: ↑April 22nd, 2025, 7:06 am OT with pick 26; we need depth and back-up for this oline. These big guys do not last all season like they did in the old days.
just depends on who is there. IF Simmons falls to 26 I would have no issues with taking him thereRAMFAN71 wrote: ↑April 22nd, 2025, 8:05 amIt's a big need, but I would not reach at 26. If top 3 are gone, just trade back and use BPA. Could be another Limmer late round pick type.Claremontram wrote: ↑April 22nd, 2025, 7:06 am OT with pick 26; we need depth and back-up for this oline. These big guys do not last all season like they did in the old days.
Agree. But only the talent evaluators know what a reach would be (right or wrong as only time will tell). Rams aren’t in a position to have to reach regardless imo.RAMFAN71 wrote: ↑April 22nd, 2025, 8:05 amIt's a big need, but I would not reach at 26. If top 3 are gone, just trade back and use BPA. Could be another Limmer late round pick type.Claremontram wrote: ↑April 22nd, 2025, 7:06 am OT with pick 26; we need depth and back-up for this oline. These big guys do not last all season like they did in the old days.
Agree...very good point. Trade back is not some free option. has to align with another team's need at 26.RamPower wrote: ↑April 22nd, 2025, 9:39 amAgree. But only the talent evaluators know what a reach would be (right or wrong as only time will tell). Rams aren’t in a position to have to reach regardless imo.
The problem with trading back is finding a trade partner. I mean if you perceive the next 20 picks in a draft as pretty equal value, good chance other teams do too. It only takes one to want to move up to grab a player they really like, but again certainly no guarantee that happens. You can trade back and completely blow it as well…
I think it all depends on if one of the QB's is still there. IF for whatever reason Dart or Milroe is there maybe the Giants come back and trade into the 1st to nab a QB? I could also see New Orleans trading back into the draft and taking one of those guys.RAMFAN71 wrote: ↑April 22nd, 2025, 10:09 amAgree...very good point. Trade back is not some free option. has to align with another team's need at 26.RamPower wrote: ↑April 22nd, 2025, 9:39 am
Agree. But only the talent evaluators know what a reach would be (right or wrong as only time will tell). Rams aren’t in a position to have to reach regardless imo.
The problem with trading back is finding a trade partner. I mean if you perceive the next 20 picks in a draft as pretty equal value, good chance other teams do too. It only takes one to want to move up to grab a player they really like, but again certainly no guarantee that happens. You can trade back and completely blow it as well…