Page 1 of 1
The Grades are in:
Posted: September 22nd, 2025, 1:00 pm
by DelMar
PFF:
Offense: (we have a guard problem)
1 - Puka Nacua, WR: 83.8
2 - Kyren Williams, RB: 80.0
3 - Kevin Dotson, RG: 76.2
4 - Blake Corum, RB: 69.8
5 - Matthew Stafford, QB: 69.2
Other notes on offense:
The interior offensive line graded as low as I’ve ever seen in a game, although they faced a tough matchup in Jordan Davis, Moro Ojomo, and Jalen Carter.
• Coleman Shelton: 57.6 run blocking; 23.3 pass blocking (holding call negated a touchdown)
• Beaux Limmer (8 snaps): 53.4 run blocking; 0.0 pass blocking
• Justin Dedich: 49.9 run blocking; 0.0 pass blocking
Defense:
1 - Quentin Lake, DB: 91.2
2 - Poona Ford, DT: 85.5
3 - Jared Verse, EDGE: 81.5
4 - Tyler Davis, DT: 77.8
5 - Nate Landman, MLB: 72.7
• Darious Williams: 2 catches on 3 targets for 34 yards and a touchdown (25 snaps)
• Cobie Durant: 3 catches on 4 targets for 62 yards (52 snaps)
• Emmanuel Forbes: 4 catches on 5 targets for 46 yards and a touchdown, one PBU (55 snaps)
We also have a Corner problem.
https://www.turfshowtimes.com/los-angel ... s-at-guard
Re: The Grades are in:
Posted: September 22nd, 2025, 1:09 pm
by RAMFAN71
It's like the scene from Animal House......."Bluto Blutarsky...zero, point, zero"
Need better pass protect from our guards...not to mention FG protect.
Re: The Grades are in:
Posted: September 22nd, 2025, 2:39 pm
by GoldenRam
Landman through 3 weeks with and 88.4 COVERAGE grade ... and a fumble a week guy 1 forced, 2 recovered
Re: The Grades are in:
Posted: September 22nd, 2025, 3:28 pm
by FelixTheStonerCat
GoldenRam wrote: ↑September 22nd, 2025, 2:39 pm
Landman through 3 weeks with and 88.4 COVERAGE grade ... and a fumble a week guy 1 forced, 2 recovered
Dude is paying dividends. Him and Ford.
Re: The Grades are in:
Posted: September 22nd, 2025, 3:31 pm
by Cornell29
Rams need corner and guard help ASAP
Re: The Grades are in:
Posted: September 22nd, 2025, 3:38 pm
by SoCalRam78
Cornell29 wrote: ↑September 22nd, 2025, 3:31 pm
Rams need corner and guard help ASAP
We knew that last spring. Was never a Shelton guy. They didn’t add anyone at CB.
Re: The Grades are in:
Posted: September 22nd, 2025, 3:53 pm
by RonMac
It seems to be taboo here to identify these areas of need and when they are ignored and not addressed, to draw attention to these failures . Like the forever Red Zone failures, no adjustments or corrections means no solutions and continued failure. Not very difficult to understand.
Re: The Grades are in:
Posted: September 22nd, 2025, 3:57 pm
by brasilrams
We seem to have a corner problem and an o line problem , what is new.
Coleman Shelton: 57.6 run blocking; 23.3 pass blocking (holding call negated a touchdown)
• Beaux Limmer (8 snaps): 53.4 run blocking; 0.0 pass blocking
• Justin Dedich: 49.9 run blocking; 0.0 pass blocking
WTF is that ?????????????? ZERO for pass blocking for dedich and limmer !?! get them out of there NOW ! Shelton is LESS than mediocre for a center . Snaps the ball high all the time , gets beat , holds on crucial plays , just flat out BAD .
Re: The Grades are in:
Posted: September 22nd, 2025, 3:58 pm
by brasilrams
Cornell29 wrote: ↑September 22nd, 2025, 3:31 pm
Rams need corner and guard help ASAP
AND Center .
Re: The Grades are in:
Posted: September 22nd, 2025, 4:24 pm
by Cornell29
brasilrams wrote: ↑September 22nd, 2025, 3:58 pm
Cornell29 wrote: ↑September 22nd, 2025, 3:31 pm
Rams need corner and guard help ASAP
AND Center .
Agreed
Re: The Grades are in:
Posted: September 22nd, 2025, 8:32 pm
by GoldenRam
Lions just showed the difference .. big game they scored TD'S, they win. Rams settled for FG's, they lost.
Re: The Grades are in:
Posted: September 22nd, 2025, 8:45 pm
by Rampager66
GoldenRam wrote: ↑September 22nd, 2025, 8:32 pm
Lions just showed the difference .. big game they scored TD'S, they win. Rams settled for FG's, they lost.
I get the point but Detroit also ran for 225 yards and 4 TD's against a porous Ravens D. This is the 2nd horrendous performance from them in the first 3 games. We'll see if Detroit can do similar to the Eagles and whether or not they can keep getting into the End zone and also how the Rams can do vs that Ravens D later on. right now the Eagles D is a lot better.
Re: The Grades are in:
Posted: September 22nd, 2025, 8:55 pm
by GoldenRam
Rampager66 wrote: ↑September 22nd, 2025, 8:45 pm
GoldenRam wrote: ↑September 22nd, 2025, 8:32 pm
Lions just showed the difference .. big game they scored TD'S, they win. Rams settled for FG's, they lost.
I get the point but Detroit also ran for 225 yards and 4 TD's against a porous Ravens D. This is the 2nd horrendous performance from them in the first 3 games. We'll see if Detroit can do similar to the Eagles and whether or not they can keep getting into the End zone and also how the Rams can do vs that Ravens D later on. right now the Eagles D is a lot better.
Which the Rams SHOULD have done against Philly. KW and Corum were pretty much rolling along, and they should have been pounding the ball when they got deep, instead, they get deep they go the passing game. Good D or not, the Rams RB's were getting the job done. They finished 4.7 and 6+ yads per carry for ffs. Your RB's are doing that POUND the fucking ball. Change just 2 of those field goals to TD's Rams put up 34 and are just running out the clock at the end, with the win all but under their belt. Lions scored TD's, Rams kicked FG's, at least the ones they got off. Better D than the Ravens or not, the Rams could very easily have beaten them, and in my mind, should have.
Re: The Grades are in:
Posted: September 22nd, 2025, 8:58 pm
by Rampager66
GoldenRam wrote: ↑September 22nd, 2025, 8:55 pm
Rampager66 wrote: ↑September 22nd, 2025, 8:45 pm
I get the point but Detroit also ran for 225 yards and 4 TD's against a porous Ravens D. This is the 2nd horrendous performance from them in the first 3 games. We'll see if Detroit can do similar to the Eagles and whether or not they can keep getting into the End zone and also how the Rams can do vs that Ravens D later on. right now the Eagles D is a lot better.
Which the Rams SHOULD have done against Philly. KW and Corum were pretty much rolling along, and they should have been pounding the ball when they got deep, instead, they get deep they go the passing game. Good D or not, the Rams RB's were getting the job done. They finished 4.7 and 6+ yads per carry for ffs. Your RB's are doing that POUND the fucking ball. Change just 2 of those field goals to TD's Rams put up 34 and are just running out the clock at the end, with the win all but under their belt. Lions scored TD's, Rams kicked FG's, at least the ones they got off. Better D than the Ravens or not, the Rams could very easily have beaten them, and in my mind, should have.
No argument from me on any of that.
Re: The Grades are in:
Posted: September 23rd, 2025, 5:26 am
by RAMFAN71
GoldenRam wrote: ↑September 22nd, 2025, 8:32 pm
Lions just showed the difference .. big game they scored TD'S, they win. Rams settled for FG's, they lost.
That's exactly right. we NEVER win games when just getting 3 points from the red zone.
Re: The Grades are in:
Posted: September 23rd, 2025, 6:09 am
by unclesams
I've said this for a while, both Durant and Williams at CB are trash.