Los Angeles Rams Gear On Sale - Save Up To 70%

Los Angeles Rams Gear On Sale - Save Up To 70%

×

Live Game Broadcast

Geo-Restrictions May Apply.

Audacy app or Listen Live.

🎧

Cold in Chicago..a different viewpoint

Open Discussion On The Los Angeles Rams

Moderator: GlendoraRam

Post Reply
User avatar
Jack85Youngblood
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 589
Joined: January 13th, 2016, 12:27 pm
Has thanked: 87 times
Been thanked: 53 times

Cold in Chicago..a different viewpoint

Post by Jack85Youngblood »

Much is being made in the media about the Rams, McVay's and Stafford's records in cold weather games. I saw a great opinion on another thread. Most of the players on the Bears team have never played a meaningful game after the regular season from mid-January on. With the wind chill predicted in the single digits, the Bears have probably never played in this type of cold either. They were sitting at home in mid-January for the last decade. These Rams showed they can play in the cold and snow. They were the only team to give Philly a game in the playoffs last year, and they could have won. The weather may certainly play a factor, but I really don't see it as an advantage to the Bears.
Image
Please Login or Become a VIP Member to Remove Advertisment
User avatar
NDIrishRam
Special Teams Player
Special Teams Player
Posts: 37
Joined: January 18th, 2016, 10:19 am
Been thanked: 18 times

Re: Cold in Chicago..a different viewpoint

Post by NDIrishRam »

I'm sure Stafford's record in cold weather has nothing to do with the fact that most of his career he played on horrible Lions teams? I'm sure the cold was the only reason he lost those games!
Please Login or Become a VIP Member to Remove Advertisment
User avatar
Cornell29
Hall of Fame Member
Hall of Fame Member
Posts: 9426
Joined: September 26th, 2016, 8:56 am
Has thanked: 149 times
Been thanked: 792 times

Re: Cold in Chicago..a different viewpoint

Post by Cornell29 »

NDIrishRam wrote: Yesterday, 10:19 am I'm sure Stafford's record in cold weather has nothing to do with the fact that most of his career he played on horrible Lions teams? I'm sure the cold was the only reason he lost those games!
Reminds me when the media and other teams fans alike was saying what Stafford playoff record was, his first season as a Ram, prior to wildcard game vs the Cards. Which, as we know, meant nothing. 4 straight post season wins including SB.
Please Login or Become a VIP Member to Remove Advertisment
User avatar
Cornell29
Hall of Fame Member
Hall of Fame Member
Posts: 9426
Joined: September 26th, 2016, 8:56 am
Has thanked: 149 times
Been thanked: 792 times

Re: Cold in Chicago..a different viewpoint

Post by Cornell29 »

Please Login or Become a VIP Member to Remove Advertisment
User avatar
eas-rams
Solid Veteran
Solid Veteran
Posts: 209
Joined: December 8th, 2016, 2:42 pm
Been thanked: 33 times

Re: Cold in Chicago..a different viewpoint

Post by eas-rams »

Jack85Youngblood wrote: Yesterday, 8:54 am Much is being made in the media about the Rams, McVay's and Stafford's records in cold weather games. I saw a great opinion on another thread. Most of the players on the Bears team have never played a meaningful game after the regular season from mid-January on. With the wind chill predicted in the single digits, the Bears have probably never played in this type of cold either. They were sitting at home in mid-January for the last decade. These Rams showed they can play in the cold and snow. They were the only team to give Philly a game in the playoffs last year, and they could have won. The weather may certainly play a factor, but I really don't see it as an advantage to the Bears.
I've been making the same point. Both teams have to play in the cold weather. Seems to me that the Rams running game and 13 personnel schemes are better suited for the cold weather. It's not like the Bears play all their games in sub-degree weather. Seems to me that where these players played college ball and the condtions they played in college would matter more. The Rams did okay again the Eagles last year, if it wasn't for two OLine gaffs the Rams probably win that game.
Please Login or Become a VIP Member to Remove Advertisment
User avatar
malibu
Hall of Fame Member
Hall of Fame Member
Posts: 2263
Joined: April 24th, 2017, 5:19 pm
Been thanked: 179 times

Re: Cold in Chicago..a different viewpoint

Post by malibu »

I think to be a contrarian we should throw throw and throw get up big early the cold will help us if we can get up big and fast.
Please Login or Become a VIP Member to Remove Advertisment
User avatar
GSOT89
Solid Veteran
Solid Veteran
Posts: 133
Joined: January 1st, 2026, 9:07 pm
Has thanked: 422 times
Been thanked: 54 times

Re: Cold in Chicago..a different viewpoint

Post by GSOT89 »

hey guys its cold, Rams should not even show up, the weather just works against the Rams.
Please Login or Become a VIP Member to Remove Advertisment
User avatar
STL Woody
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 1331
Joined: August 27th, 2016, 6:22 am
Has thanked: 230 times
Been thanked: 115 times

Re: Cold in Chicago..a different viewpoint

Post by STL Woody »

Cornell29 wrote: Yesterday, 11:53 am
Won’t it also be the coldest place the bears have played this year 😂😂😂
Loyalty over Location...
Please Login or Become a VIP Member to Remove Advertisment
User avatar
ocram23
Hall of Fame Member
Hall of Fame Member
Posts: 11643
Joined: October 15th, 2019, 6:12 pm
Has thanked: 186 times
Been thanked: 449 times

Re: Cold in Chicago..a different viewpoint

Post by ocram23 »

until the Rams can prove to win a playoff game in this kind of weather it will continue to be a big story.
Please Login or Become a VIP Member to Remove Advertisment
User avatar
NorCal RF
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 7939
Joined: October 26th, 2016, 12:11 pm
Has thanked: 92 times
Been thanked: 625 times

Re: Cold in Chicago..a different viewpoint

Post by NorCal RF »

Ok good spot to say this……..

It’s going to be cold got it. But it is also going to turn into a football game with both teams playing in the weather. So……..

There is a huge statistical, yep I know I hate that word but am saying it, gap on one side of the ball with these 2 teams. And that is the Rams offense against their D. The 2 played at opposite ends of the spectrum this year and it’s not close……..

Rams #1 passing team in NFL. Chicago’s pass D just horrible. Rams 7th best rushing team in NFL. Chicago’s run D in the 20’s. Yards allowed by Chicago towards the bottom. It is very one sided on that side of the ball between the two teams……..

I know Carolina. Carolina’s D was not Chicago’s D this year n if Nacua catches that ball we would have put up 41 points on a Stafford off day……..

Bears offense very good. Rams secondary, well we know. But their 3rd rank rushing offense is going against a 12th rank rushing defense. Not one as low as the Bears rushing D……..

Defensive sacks? Rams 6th Bears 22nd………

I’ll even go as far as saying I think Mevis is better than Santos. I do though think their return game is a concern………

Point is this isn’t the Seahawks or Texans D this Sunday. Far from it. Far from it. At some point Sunday I think this will be the overwhelming subject of the game n not the weather………
Please Login or Become a VIP Member to Remove Advertisment
User avatar
ocram23
Hall of Fame Member
Hall of Fame Member
Posts: 11643
Joined: October 15th, 2019, 6:12 pm
Has thanked: 186 times
Been thanked: 449 times

Re: Cold in Chicago..a different viewpoint

Post by ocram23 »

NorCal RF wrote: Today, 9:00 am Ok good spot to say this……..

It’s going to be cold got it. But it is also going to turn into a football game with both teams playing in the weather. So……..

There is a huge statistical, yep I know I hate that word but am saying it, gap on one side of the ball with these 2 teams. And that is the Rams offense against their D. The 2 played at opposite ends of the spectrum this year and it’s not close……..

Rams #1 passing team in NFL. Chicago’s pass D just horrible. Rams 7th best rushing team in NFL. Chicago’s run D in the 20’s. Yards allowed by Chicago towards the bottom. It is very one sided on that side of the ball between the two teams……..

I know Carolina. Carolina’s D was not Chicago’s D this year n if Nacua catches that ball we would have put up 41 points on a Stafford off day……..

Bears offense very good. Rams secondary, well we know. But their 3rd rank rushing offense is going against a 12th rank rushing defense. Not one as low as the Bears rushing D……..

Defensive sacks? Rams 6th Bears 22nd………

I’ll even go as far as saying I think Mevis is better than Santos. I do though think their return game is a concern………

Point is this isn’t the Seahawks or Texans D this Sunday. Far from it. Far from it. At some point Sunday I think this will be the overwhelming subject of the game n not the weather………
valid points but I think the run game is going to be the key to the game due to the weather. 15-25 mph winds so how successful is the pass game going to be???? IMO the wind is more of a story than the cold.
Please Login or Become a VIP Member to Remove Advertisment
User avatar
Jack85Youngblood
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 589
Joined: January 13th, 2016, 12:27 pm
Has thanked: 87 times
Been thanked: 53 times

Re: Cold in Chicago..a different viewpoint

Post by Jack85Youngblood »

I went back and looked at the weather in Chicago this year for home games in December and January. The Bears did play in frigid conditions like the one expected this Sunday when they took on the Browns on December 14th. All their other home games in those months were near freezing (32degrees) or above. FWIW
Image
Please Login or Become a VIP Member to Remove Advertisment
User avatar
NorCal RF
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 7939
Joined: October 26th, 2016, 12:11 pm
Has thanked: 92 times
Been thanked: 625 times

Re: Cold in Chicago..a different viewpoint

Post by NorCal RF »

ocram23 wrote: Today, 9:04 am
NorCal RF wrote: Today, 9:00 am Ok good spot to say this……..

It’s going to be cold got it. But it is also going to turn into a football game with both teams playing in the weather. So……..

There is a huge statistical, yep I know I hate that word but am saying it, gap on one side of the ball with these 2 teams. And that is the Rams offense against their D. The 2 played at opposite ends of the spectrum this year and it’s not close……..

Rams #1 passing team in NFL. Chicago’s pass D just horrible. Rams 7th best rushing team in NFL. Chicago’s run D in the 20’s. Yards allowed by Chicago towards the bottom. It is very one sided on that side of the ball between the two teams……..

I know Carolina. Carolina’s D was not Chicago’s D this year n if Nacua catches that ball we would have put up 41 points on a Stafford off day……..

Bears offense very good. Rams secondary, well we know. But their 3rd rank rushing offense is going against a 12th rank rushing defense. Not one as low as the Bears rushing D……..

Defensive sacks? Rams 6th Bears 22nd………

I’ll even go as far as saying I think Mevis is better than Santos. I do though think their return game is a concern………

Point is this isn’t the Seahawks or Texans D this Sunday. Far from it. Far from it. At some point Sunday I think this will be the overwhelming subject of the game n not the weather………
valid points but I think the run game is going to be the key to the game due to the weather. 15-25 mph winds so how successful is the pass game going to be???? IMO the wind is more of a story than the cold.
Agree on wind………..

So I feel good about our 7th rated rushing offense against their fairly low rated rushing D……….

And the same with our 12th ranked rushing D against yes a very good Bears rushing offense. But If not for the regular season Carolina game and the Atlanta game our D would be in the top 10 with this. They have played well against the run all season against some really good backs………

There will be passes thrown this Sunday. I’ll trust Stafford…………..
Please Login or Become a VIP Member to Remove Advertisment
User avatar
ocram23
Hall of Fame Member
Hall of Fame Member
Posts: 11643
Joined: October 15th, 2019, 6:12 pm
Has thanked: 186 times
Been thanked: 449 times

Re: Cold in Chicago..a different viewpoint

Post by ocram23 »

NorCal RF wrote: Today, 10:00 am
ocram23 wrote: Today, 9:04 am

valid points but I think the run game is going to be the key to the game due to the weather. 15-25 mph winds so how successful is the pass game going to be???? IMO the wind is more of a story than the cold.
Agree on wind………..

So I feel good about our 7th rated rushing offense against their fairly low rated rushing D……….

And the same with our 12th ranked rushing D against yes a very good Bears rushing offense. But If not for the regular season Carolina game and the Atlanta game our D would be in the top 10 with this. They have played well against the run all season against some really good backs………

There will be passes thrown this Sunday. I’ll trust Stafford…………..
I agree the Rams are the better team. Just need to go out and execute on Sunday
Please Login or Become a VIP Member to Remove Advertisment
User avatar
DelMar
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 7830
Joined: January 31st, 2023, 11:01 am
Has thanked: 1517 times
Been thanked: 936 times

Re: Cold in Chicago..a different viewpoint

Post by DelMar »

NorCal RF wrote: Today, 9:00 am Ok good spot to say this……..

It’s going to be cold got it. But it is also going to turn into a football game with both teams playing in the weather. So……..

There is a huge statistical, yep I know I hate that word but am saying it, gap on one side of the ball with these 2 teams. And that is the Rams offense against their D. The 2 played at opposite ends of the spectrum this year and it’s not close……..

Rams #1 passing team in NFL. Chicago’s pass D just horrible. Rams 7th best rushing team in NFL. Chicago’s run D in the 20’s. Yards allowed by Chicago towards the bottom. It is very one sided on that side of the ball between the two teams……..

I know Carolina. Carolina’s D was not Chicago’s D this year n if Nacua catches that ball we would have put up 41 points on a Stafford off day……..

Bears offense very good. Rams secondary, well we know. But their 3rd rank rushing offense is going against a 12th rank rushing defense. Not one as low as the Bears rushing D……..

Defensive sacks? Rams 6th Bears 22nd………

I’ll even go as far as saying I think Mevis is better than Santos. I do though think their return game is a concern………

Point is this isn’t the Seahawks or Texans D this Sunday. Far from it. Far from it. At some point Sunday I think this will be the overwhelming subject of the game n not the weather………

^ This

Well thought out response here, perfectly stated imo. 😎
Please Login or Become a VIP Member to Remove Advertisment
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Cornell29, GlendoraRam, OldSurfer and 53 guests