Will Rams solve OT - TE - CB - LB early on ?

[RonMac]

Good to be back fellas / IMO these spots must be addressed relatively early on for the 2025 Rams to be legit contenders. A trade out of the 26 th spot could insure 4 picks in the first 4 rounds . Can/Will they address these rather urgent needs early ?

[ocram23]

I think they will continue to use the BPA philosophy and whoever is on top of their board no matter the position they will take.

[NorCal RF]

I think they will continue to use the BPA philosophy and whoever is on top of their board no matter the position they will take.

I’ll say it again this^

Solved? I don't think Sneed or McVay thinks there is a pressing need to “solve a problem” at OT or TE for 2025. I emphasize 2025. The starting OL returns as well as there are 3 TE on roster.

[RAMFAN71]

I think they will continue to use the BPA philosophy and whoever is on top of their board no matter the position they will take.

I’ll say it again this^

Solved? I don't think Sneed or McVay thinks there is a pressing need to “solve a problem” at OT or TE for 2025. I emphasize 2025. The starting OL returns as well as there are 3 TE on roster.

If I'm the Rams, I'm pretty concerned about the LT spot. These guys never seem to stay healthy for 17 games. We need depth there. This will have to be addressed IMO unless I am missing something. It's mot McClendon at LT. Or Arcuri.

[Slickjack]

I think we are writing off Higbee too soon, he looked much better in his return than in recent years.

[NorCal RF]

I’ll say it again this^

Solved? I don't think Sneed or McVay thinks there is a pressing need to “solve a problem” at OT or TE for 2025. I emphasize 2025. The starting OL returns as well as there are 3 TE on roster.

If I'm the Rams, I'm pretty concerned about the LT spot. These guys never seem to stay healthy for 17 games. We need depth there. This will have to be addressed IMO unless I am missing something. It's mot McClendon at LT. Or Arcuri.

Agree. More depth is needed and McVay indicated such a few months ago. But depth can be addressed in later rounds. Im not doing it at 26. And im not drafting a OT at 26 unless they feel he is the heir apparent for Havs.

[bigklein]

When the Rams didn’t have either A Jackson or Havenstein, they were clearly a lesser team, which is why I’m sticking with Conerly (or Simmons). We don’t know what KT Leveston brings, but they held onto him
all year. McClendon and Arcuri just might not cut it. OT may not be a sexy first pick, but it may be necessary.

[RamPower]

BPA. If it hits an area of need, great.

[therealheadslap75]

ah the mythical BPA myth, its Need+BPA/2, If we have an OLB as the top guy on our board when we pick are we picking him? What about QB? I doubt it. Its always a needs based draft, if someone is a significant value when we pick, in a position that's important to stockpile, Ie OL and DL maybe we take them, I'm thinking we pick a CB or a WR, but I'm hoping we take Jihad

[Ramsfan08ny]

I think they will continue to use the BPA philosophy and whoever is on top of their board no matter the position they will take.

I agree, and the selection may upset some.

[Ramsfan08ny]

ah the mythical BPA myth, its Need+BPA/2, If we have an OLB as the top guy on our board when we pick are we picking him? What about QB? I doubt it. Its always a needs based draft, if someone is a significant value when we pick, in a position that's important to stockpile, Ie OL and DL maybe we take them, I'm thinking we pick a CB or a WR, but I'm hoping we take Jihad

BPA is a myth anyways. We don't know their board, they may take the BPA on 'their' board, but we may have a different BPA, or Mel Kiper may have a different BPA.

But I do agree with what you're saying. I'm sure that they have guys tied on their list, and then it may come down to BPA+ need formula to see who they lean to.

[ocram23]

ah the mythical BPA myth, its Need+BPA/2, If we have an OLB as the top guy on our board when we pick are we picking him? What about QB? I doubt it. Its always a needs based draft, if someone is a significant value when we pick, in a position that's important to stockpile, Ie OL and DL maybe we take them, I'm thinking we pick a CB or a WR, but I'm hoping we take Jihad

BPA is a myth anyways. We don't know their board, they may take the BPA on 'their' board, but we may have a different BPA, or Mel Kiper may have a different BPA.

But I do agree with what you're saying. I'm sure that they have guys tied on their list, and then it may come down to BPA+ need formula to see who they lean to.

of course each team has their own BPA board and yes I don't think many teams give 2 shits what Mel Kiper thinks

[RamPower]

ah the mythical BPA myth, its Need+BPA/2, If we have an OLB as the top guy on our board when we pick are we picking him? What about QB? I doubt it. Its always a needs based draft, if someone is a significant value when we pick, in a position that's important to stockpile, Ie OL and DL maybe we take them, I'm thinking we pick a CB or a WR, but I'm hoping we take Jihad

Trick question? Do they take LB or QB @ #26 if they are the highest on their board? Uh... yes. Their best evaluated player meets areas of need would be welcomed for sure. LB now, QB very soon down the road as well.

Impact player is an impact player regardless of the position of course (w/ QB in its own category obviously). I mean there's quite a few D-lineman I'd be very happy with @ #26 even though it's currently a team strength.

If players are 1A and 1B, and one is an extreme area of need, (the other not what's-so-ever), then area of need all the way. But basically, I would be swinging for the next impact starter with our 1st round pick. If nothing comes close, and the next 10 picks look basically the same, sure trade down or whatever.

I love the draft as I look for someone to fall. This year I doubt it happens (the players in the top 15-20 seem pretty solid to stay there), but you never know. Here's hoping this year's Rams scouting knows what they are doing for an amazing third year in a row...

[ocram23]

ah the mythical BPA myth, its Need+BPA/2, If we have an OLB as the top guy on our board when we pick are we picking him? What about QB? I doubt it. Its always a needs based draft, if someone is a significant value when we pick, in a position that's important to stockpile, Ie OL and DL maybe we take them, I'm thinking we pick a CB or a WR, but I'm hoping we take Jihad

Trick question? Do they take LB or QB @ #26 if they are the highest on their board? Uh... yes. Their best evaluated player meets areas of need would be welcomed for sure. LB now, QB very soon down the road as well.

Impact player is an impact player regardless of the position of course (w/ QB in its own category obviously). I mean there's quite a few D-lineman I'd be very happy with @ #26 even though it's currently a team strength.

If players are 1A and 1B, and one is an extreme area of need, (the other not what's-so-ever), then area of need all the way. But basically, I would be swinging for the next impact starter with our 1st round pick. If nothing comes close, and the next 10 picks look basically the same, sure trade down or whatever.

I love the draft as I look for someone to fall. This year I doubt it happens (the players in the top 15-20 seem pretty solid to stay there), but you never know. Here's hoping this year's Rams scouting knows what they are doing for an amazing third year in a row...

decision will be on McSnead obviously if it comes to that

[Claremontram]

OT with pick 26; we need depth and back-up for this oline. These big guys do not last all season like they did in the old days.

[RAMFAN71]

OT with pick 26; we need depth and back-up for this oline. These big guys do not last all season like they did in the old days.

It's a big need, but I would not reach at 26. If top 3 are gone, just trade back and use BPA. Could be another Limmer late round pick type.

[ocram23]

OT with pick 26; we need depth and back-up for this oline. These big guys do not last all season like they did in the old days.

It's a big need, but I would not reach at 26. If top 3 are gone, just trade back and use BPA. Could be another Limmer late round pick type.

just depends on who is there. IF Simmons falls to 26 I would have no issues with taking him there

[RamPower]

OT with pick 26; we need depth and back-up for this oline. These big guys do not last all season like they did in the old days.

It's a big need, but I would not reach at 26. If top 3 are gone, just trade back and use BPA. Could be another Limmer late round pick type.

Agree. But only the talent evaluators know what a reach would be (right or wrong as only time will tell). Rams aren’t in a position to have to reach regardless imo.

The problem with trading back is finding a trade partner. I mean if you perceive the next 20 picks in a draft as pretty equal value, good chance other teams do too. It only takes one to want to move up to grab a player they really like, but again certainly no guarantee that happens. You can trade back and completely blow it as well…

[RAMFAN71]

It's a big need, but I would not reach at 26. If top 3 are gone, just trade back and use BPA. Could be another Limmer late round pick type.

Agree. But only the talent evaluators know what a reach would be (right or wrong as only time will tell). Rams aren’t in a position to have to reach regardless imo.

The problem with trading back is finding a trade partner. I mean if you perceive the next 20 picks in a draft as pretty equal value, good chance other teams do too. It only takes one to want to move up to grab a player they really like, but again certainly no guarantee that happens. You can trade back and completely blow it as well…

Agree...very good point. Trade back is not some free option. has to align with another team's need at 26.

[ocram23]

Agree. But only the talent evaluators know what a reach would be (right or wrong as only time will tell). Rams aren’t in a position to have to reach regardless imo.

The problem with trading back is finding a trade partner. I mean if you perceive the next 20 picks in a draft as pretty equal value, good chance other teams do too. It only takes one to want to move up to grab a player they really like, but again certainly no guarantee that happens. You can trade back and completely blow it as well…

Agree...very good point. Trade back is not some free option. has to align with another team's need at 26.

I think it all depends on if one of the QB's is still there. IF for whatever reason Dart or Milroe is there maybe the Giants come back and trade into the 1st to nab a QB? I could also see New Orleans trading back into the draft and taking one of those guys.